Gitmo is the Anti-Statue of Liberty

	Duration: 58 seconds Upload Time: 06-07-09 04:56:10 User: LiberalViewer :::: Favorites
Description: NOTICE OF NON-INFRINGEMENT: THIS SHORT CLIP FROM CBS NEWS WAS UPLOADED FOR "FAIR USE" PURPOSES OF ANALYSIS/CRITICISM ON A PUBLIC ISSUE Thomas Friedman answering a question on "Face The Nation" about Guantanamo including the great quote "Guantanamo Bay has become the Anti-Statue of Liberty." Share with friends
Comments
truthcommission ::: Favorites Its should be called the Statue of Anti-Libery. Thinks about it. 06-07-26 21:41:54 _____________________________________________________
timetripping ::: Favorites While we were watching this video, my wife said the exact same thing truthcommission. Great minds think alike. Shut it down now! It's a disgrace! 06-08-13 14:59:51 _____________________________________________________
tom500k ::: Favorites Amazing and heartening that even Thomas Friedman recognizes the truth at last: Gitmo = torture and generates violence and endangers all. 06-11-13 17:06:45 _____________________________________________________
johnbrew12 ::: Favorites the terrorist individuals incarcerated at gitmo are not being held just for fun. these are the guys working to blow up or behead you and your children. 06-11-20 05:32:18 _____________________________________________________
LiberalViewer ::: Favorites johnbrew, Then how do you explain the list of individuals at: http://tinyurl*DOT*com/y8cndf And is it fair to be locked up for years without being charged with anything when it turns out you did nothing? Thx 4 comment :-) 06-11-20 21:26:56 _____________________________________________________
johnbrew12 ::: Favorites in the united states we have the best protections for the accused of anywhere in the world, and this is a good thing, because our system errs on letting the accused go even if there's decent evidence they did it, rather than locking them up unjustly. but foreign enemy combatants don't deserve the same protections as our citizens, and you're not going to win a war by giving them these protections. 06-11-22 17:05:08 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
Imnotme2232 ::: Favorites so you are saying that non americans are not intitled to a leagle defence? many in gitmo have nothing to with terrorizum. 07-03-15 19:01:04 _____________________________________________________
johnbrew12 ::: Favorites there is a fine line between our civil rights concerns and our national security concerns, and neither ought to be taken lightly. 06-11-22 17:11:08 _____________________________________________________
jonbankrupt ::: Favorites but then if you are so sure that these people are terrorists, why can't they have lawyers if the evidence against them is overwhelming? 07-07-09 10:10:23 _____________________________________________________
zpdd7 ::: Favorites Can't believe I agreed with Friedman for once. Kudos the Tom. 07-02-03 15:51:58 _____________________________________________________